2/15/2024 0 Comments Mremote ng macApart from that KiTTY has many different features such as:. However, KiTTY solves one of the basic limitations of PuTTYâs, which is simultaneously representing multiple sessions. As KiTTY was built altering the source code of PuTTY, it offers almost the same user interface and user experience. While, the interface is developed for the Windows operating system but one can remotely access computers that run Linux, Mac OS, and Unix. In simple words, KiTTY is a better version of PuTTY that not only has all the features that PuTTY has but offers many more. Then we can start building a *Nix compatible UI.The KiTTY application is a fork of PuTTY, as such, it is coded on the same foundations of PuTTY.We would need to integrate with native Linux terminal. They offer Linux versions of the Citrix Receiver, so we might be ok here. Would need to integrate FreeRDP or some other open source implementation Implementations will be different between Windows and Linux for some providers: Better support for pluggable protocol providers.Hopefully this will come for (mostly) free when splitting the UI and business logic. The library assembly must be converted to.I have been doing some work to remove static methods and classes as much as possible and this has uncovered a few very hairy circular dependencies that involve UI classes. This is something I was planning on starting in the next major release (1.77). UI and core business logic must be split into separate assemblies. ![]() Here is the high level overview of what needs to happen: ![]() I would love to have this, but it is unfortunately still a long ways off.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |